Partnerships and equity acquisitions among Korean institutions are accelerating simultaneously in the crypto market. Yet the landscape remains difficult to read at a glance. Announced partnerships are abundant, but actual commercial deployments remain rare. This report examines why the conversion rate is low, and why institutions continue to move forward regardless.
Key Takeaways
Korean institutional crypto activity has moved beyond MOUs into concrete business operations and exchange equity acquisitions.
Competition is intensifying beneath the surface as institutions race to claim critical financial infrastructure, including STO standard-setting, stablecoin payment rails, and custody markets.
Domestic infrastructure builders are emerging as a core pillar of institutional business, constructing Korea-native rails aligned with Bank of Korea CBDC frameworks and local regulatory requirements, reducing dependence on foreign technology.
The playbook for overseas Web3 foundations entering Korea has shifted entirely, moving from retail community building to partnerships with large corporates and financial institutions, as traditional finance accelerates its takeover of the market.
1. The MOU Arms Race
The relationship map above, compiled by Tiger Research, maps the connections across Korea’s institutional crypto landscape. Yet the structure is not easy to read at a glance. It is difficult to distinguish which lines represent active business operations and which are simply MOUs, and the boundary between central hubs and peripheral players remains blurred.
What is notable is that this complexity itself accurately reflects the current state of Korea’s institutional crypto market. As Tiger Research’s dataset of 150 institutions and 196 partnerships confirms, no single hub has yet achieved dominant control over the market.
Domestic institutions are simultaneously building their positions across the market before regulations are fully finalized. Competition is currently organized around three fronts: stablecoins, STOs (security token offerings), and custody (crypto asset storage).
Also notable is a sustained wave of financial institutions acquiring equity stakes in exchanges, a move interpreted as a confidence-driven push to secure footholds ahead of full regulatory clarity.
2. The Exchange Equity Scramble
Within less than ten days of Hana Bank announcing its acquisition of a 6.55% stake in Dunamu, the operator of Upbit, for approximately KRW 1 trillion (approx. USD 720 million), Hanwha Investment Securities approved the acquisition of an additional 3.90%. On May 28 of the same month, Samsung Securities, Samsung SDS, and Samsung Card jointly announced a combined 4.0% acquisition. Mirae Asset Consulting had already signed a contract in February to acquire 92.06% of Korbit, and reports emerged that Korea Investment Securities and global exchange OKX are in discussions over a joint acquisition of Coinone.
The competition reflects a revaluation of crypto exchanges, which are now seen not merely as trading fee platforms but as critical customer touchpoints through which stablecoins, custody services, security tokens, and RWA products can be distributed.
Banks and securities firms gain a pathway to indirectly obtain licenses such as VASP registration while simultaneously securing an exchange’s user base and liquidity. The current equity scramble is ultimately a contest over who will control the front-end of digital asset finance.
3. Korea’s Crypto Market by Sector
A sector-by-sector look at the relationship map reveals an uneven landscape. Custody has the most operational activity, with a number of players already running live services after clearing regulatory hurdles. RWA and STO, by contrast, remain largely stuck at the contract or MOU stage, waiting for enabling legislation to take effect. Stablecoins face a similar stall, with no clear standard-setter yet in a position to claim market leadership.
Because the nature of the barrier differs by sector, so does the strategy for breaking through. Some players are consolidating domestic coalitions while waiting for regulation to open. Others are turning to overseas markets where regulation has moved faster, carving out alternative paths. The sections below examine the specific barriers and player strategies in each sector.
3.1. RWA/STO: Legislation Passed, Commercialization Infrastructure Is the Bottleneck
The domestic STO market is divided into two camps: the KOSCOM-led consortium and the Shinhan Investment Securities-led fractional investment alliance. Mirae Asset Securities has taken a separate path, leveraging overseas operations rather than waiting on domestic infrastructure.
KOSCOM, a core financial network operator in which Korea Exchange holds a 76.6% stake, is pursuing a neutral infrastructure model consistent with its founding mandate to provide shared infrastructure for securities firms. Rather than signing exclusive agreements with individual issuers, it is integrating 11 securities firms onto its platform, aiming to set issuance and distribution technology standards and secure interfaces compatible with Korea Securities Depository aggregate custody management requirements.
Shinhan Investment Securities has moved quickly to build its own STO ecosystem. Starting with a proof-of-concept with Lambda 256 in 2022, it launched the joint platform PULSE in 2024 and formalized a multi-platform account integration service in 2025. In 2025 alone, it participated as account manager in 10 investment contract security issuances, and secured a controlling stake in OTC exchange NXT, establishing an end-to-end pipeline from issuance to distribution within its own ecosystem.
Mirae Asset Securities bypassed domestic infrastructure development entirely and moved overseas. It issued a digital bond in Hong Kong, obtained a digital asset retail license from the Hong Kong Securities and Futures Commission (SFC), and plans to launch an MTS in June targeting retail investors in the market. In the United States, it is the only Korean securities firm to join the DTCC-led tokenization working group, which includes JP Morgan, Goldman Sachs, and BlackRock, participating in global standard-setting discussions. The strategy positions Mirae Asset to hold advantages in regulatory alignment and negotiating leverage when domestic STO infrastructure eventually connects to global standards.
3.2. Stablecoins: Legislation, Not Technology, Is the Bottleneck
The stablecoin market features a more diverse set of participants than other sectors. Card companies, exchanges, fintechs, and infrastructure firms are each entering through different routes, drawing on their respective strengths.
The largest camp is the Kakao Group. Kakao, KakaoBank, and Kakao Pay have formed a joint task force to build a “super wallet” spanning stablecoins, crypto, and local currencies. Their key asset is the infrastructure accumulated through operating the Kaia public chain since the Ground X era. Kaia has already deployed Tether (USDT) on its network and is conducting live payment tests.
Shinhan Card is focused on migrating its existing payment network onto blockchain rails. Shinhan Card signed an MOU with Solana in April, though the technical groundwork preceded the agreement. The company had already completed an initial proof-of-concept in collaboration with Solana, Visa, Mastercard, and Fireblocks, and is now running advanced tests across six areas including wallets and smart contracts.
The exchange camp is routing around KRW stablecoin delays via dollar stablecoins. Dunamu is developing a KRW stablecoin business with Naver Financial, built on its proprietary blockchain GIWA. Bithumb, facing delays in KRW stablecoin regulation, has chosen to secure a dollar stablecoin distribution network first through partnerships with Circle and WLF. A joint KRW stablecoin initiative with Toss is also under discussion, though progress remains slow.
All camps are active, but all face the same regulatory wall. The Bank of Korea is pushing a 51% rule requiring that only bank-majority consortiums be permitted to issue stablecoins, while fintech firms are pushing back for access, delaying government-ruling party consultations. Once issuance guidelines are released, the camp that has secured the most comprehensive public-facing touchpoints is expected to take market leadership.
3.3. Custody: More Institutional Capital Needed
The custody market is structurally simpler than other sectors. Four major custodians have each secured domestic and international financial and technology partners to establish their market positions.
KODA was co-founded by KB Kookmin Bank, Hashed, and Hatch Labs, combining traditional financial capital with crypto-native VC. Hanwha Investment Securities, IBK Capital, and Kyobo Securities have since joined as investors, and a dedicated custody insurance agreement with Samsung Fire & Marine further reinforces its stability.
KDAC is a traditional finance-led custodian with Shinhan Bank and NH NongHyup Bank as major shareholders. NH NongHyup Bank was originally an investor in a separate custodian, Kardo, and became a KDAC shareholder following a merger. Post-merger, KDAC counts two of Korea’s five major banks among its shareholders.
BDACS has taken a distinct approach centered on technology and partnership development. Expanding custody and payment infrastructure through a partnership with Woori Bank and international digital asset infrastructure firms including Galaxy and GK8, it has also signed an MOU with Circle to issue the KRW stablecoin KRW1 on Circle’s Arc blockchain, and is the sole VASP and a key custody partner in the KRX-led KDX consortium. Currently conducting a PoC for KRW1, BDACS is positioning itself as a custodian targeting both custody and payment infrastructure simultaneously.
BitGo Korea entered the domestic market on the strength of its global parent’s technology. BitGo’s headquarters custodies over USD 70 billion in assets and processes approximately 20% of all Bitcoin on-chain transactions globally. Domestically, Hana Financial Group and SK Telecom each hold stakes, making it a custodian backed by both financial and telecommunications capital.
Various institutions have entered the market through their respective custodian relationships. However, all major custodians are reported to have posted net losses last year, suggesting they have built ahead of the institutional capital flows needed to sustain operations.
Taken together, the infrastructure buildout across STO, stablecoins, and custody reveals a clear common limitation: domestic institutions have constructed their business frameworks, but the underlying technology infrastructure remains largely dependent on overseas solutions.
4. The Infrastructure Builders
Dependence on overseas solutions carries a structural cost: as the market grows, a significant share of revenues will flow abroad in the form of technology licensing fees. Domestic infrastructure also becomes exposed to the risk of disruption should overseas partners change their policies or raise costs.
The more fundamental problem is that areas requiring alignment with Korea-specific regulatory environments, such as KRW stablecoin issuance, STO distribution rules, and domestic corporate account integration, cannot simply apply global solutions off the shelf. This is precisely why domestic technology firms capable of directly designing and controlling the underlying rails in accordance with Korean regulatory frameworks will be essential once relevant legislation is finalized and capital begins to move in earnest.
Domestic companies that have identified this technical gap and are building Korea-specific financial infrastructure are already in motion. The leading technology providers are as follows.
4.1. LG CNS
Among traditional IT service firms, LG CNS has taken the most visible position. Since launching its proprietary blockchain platform ‘Monachain’ in 2018, it has built operational expertise by supplying services to over 220 local governments through the Korea Minting and Security Printing Corporation’s local currency platform.
This permissioned blockchain experience translated into CBDC and STO contract wins. As the lead contractor for the Bank of Korea’s CBDC project ‘Hangang’, LG CNS is developing a government subsidy disbursement system utilizing deposit tokens. Through this process, it has built the capability to architect systems that run institutional CBDC and private digital currency on a single network, effectively transplanting the security standards and procedures of traditional finance onto a blockchain.
Development of KOSCOM’s joint STO issuance platform and Mirae Asset Securities’ STO platform follows the same logic. Rather than issuing assets directly, LG CNS is targeting three axes: building issuance and distribution platforms for banks, providing SaaS to payment operators including card companies, PGs, and simple payment services, and developing digital asset payment platforms for securities firms. It appears to be the most credible candidate to capture the infrastructure contract market once regulatory frameworks are finalized.
4.2. DSRV
Among blockchain infrastructure firms, DSRV stands out for directly enabling financial institutions’ entry into onchain infrastructure. A validator and infrastructure company with operations across more than 70 blockchain networks, DSRV manages over KRW 4 trillion (approx. USD 2.9 billion) in assets, ranks first in Ethereum staking domestically, and sits in the global top 10.
The key development is its expansion beyond node operation into full-stack institutional onchain infrastructure. Through DSRV Portal, financial institutions can access wallet, payment, tokenization, custody, and staking functions via API and dashboard interfaces. Without building their own node and security infrastructure, financial firms can attach user wallets, institutional wallets, recurring payments, token issuance, burning, transfer and lockup, custody, and staking capabilities.
Trust mechanisms are also in place. DSRV leads with VASP, ISMS, and SOC 1 Type 1 certifications, directly addressing the regulatory, security, and operational control requirements that financial institutions demand. In practice, this means an external infrastructure provider takes on the wallet security, internal controls, and operational risk that financial firms find most burdensome when deploying onchain services.
Its partnerships are oriented toward payment rail construction. With SBI Ripple Asia, DSRV is jointly developing Korea-Japan regulation-compatible remittance infrastructure. With Circle, it is developing an institutional USDC issuance, redemption, and settlement framework that bypasses exchanges. With BC Card, it has signed a stablecoin payment infrastructure agreement connecting traditional card payment networks to blockchain.
DSRV recently closed a KRW 30 billion (approx. USD 21.7 million) Series B round, accelerating its technology development.
4.3. Altus(Prev. B-Harvest)
Altus (formerly B-Harvest) operates at the integration layer between financial institutions’ legacy systems and blockchain environments. Founded in 2018, the firm has contributed to Cosmos SDK-based EVM chain development and is an organization of 40+ engineers and researchers who have directly built multiple production networks including Canto, Crescent, Stable, and Ault.
Altus handled protocol engineering and core architecture for Ault Blockchain, an institutional L1 focused on RWA, trading, and payments. In 2025, it contributed to EVM integration, performance improvements, and security audits for Babylon, the Bitcoin staking L1, supporting its production readiness.
Its financial institution solutions originate from the same layer. Altus builds from scratch to financial industry requirements: on/off-chain orchestration layers bridging legacy systems to blockchain execution environments, RWA tokenization, permissioned exchanges, stablecoin payment and settlement, and institutional wallet and custody infrastructure.
Current internal R&D runs in parallel: Canton Network architecture supporting selective data disclosure between institutions, and Commonware Stack, a modular blockchain framework targeting 1M TPS.
The three firms start from different positions with different strengths. LG CNS leads with financial IT credibility, DSRV with blockchain validator infrastructure, and Altus with protocol-level custom design capability. Yet all share the same destination: securing the core operating systems before institutional capital flows in at scale. The determining factor is how much credible build experience each can accumulate before the market fully opens.
5. Retail Out, Institutions In
The recent surge in partnership announcements should not be read as ordinary business development. These are positioning moves: institutions are staking out favorable arrangements before regulation is finalized, then using those arrangements to shape what the regulatory framework ultimately looks like. The current partnership race is less about market capture and more about regulatory design.
Korea’s crypto market has restructured significantly in just six months. Custody camps have formed, STO consortiums have taken shape, and major financial holding companies have moved to acquire exchange equity. Meanwhile, retail trading volume has declined sharply. Combined trading volume across Korea’s five major exchanges fell approximately 48% year-on-year. The market’s center of gravity is shifting rapidly from retail to institutional.
This shift has also changed how overseas crypto foundations approach Korea. Just as Solana was adopted as Shinhan Card’s partner and Avalanche as Mirae Asset’s, foundations entering the domestic market have shifted their primary focus from exchange trading volume to partnerships with financial institutions and large corporates. The community meetup model that once drove retail liquidity is no longer effective.
The results of this market restructuring are expected to become visible at KBW 2026, taking place in Seoul this September, an event that consistently reflects prevailing market conditions. A look at the confirmed speaker lineup already shows traditional finance figures in the majority. Where last year’s overseas foundations competed through token-incentivized community side events, this year’s focus is expected to shift toward substantive business discussions.
Tiger Research is the official research partner of KBW 2026.
🐯 More from Tiger Research
Read more reports related to this research.Disclaimer
This report has been prepared based on materials believed to be reliable. However, we do not expressly or impliedly warrant the accuracy, completeness, and suitability of the information. We disclaim any liability for any losses arising from the use of this report or its contents. The conclusions and recommendations in this report are based on information available at the time of preparation and are subject to change without notice. All projects, estimates, forecasts, objectives, opinions, and views expressed in this report are subject to change without notice and may differ from or be contrary to the opinions of others or other organizations.
This document is for informational purposes only and should not be considered legal, business, investment, or tax advice. Any references to securities or digital assets are for illustrative purposes only and do not constitute an investment recommendation or an offer to provide investment advisory services. This material is not directed at investors or potential investors.
Terms of Usage
Tiger Research allows the fair use of its reports. ‘Fair use’ is a principle that broadly permits the use of specific content for public interest purposes, as long as it doesn’t harm the commercial value of the material. If the use aligns with the purpose of fair use, the reports can be utilized without prior permission. However, when citing Tiger Research’s reports, it is mandatory to 1) clearly state ‘Tiger Research’ as the source, 2) include the Tiger Research logo. If the material is to be restructured and published, separate negotiations are required. Unauthorized use of the reports may result in legal action.
